Page 1 of 1

Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:44 am
by -default
Thanks Mike Arst for the pointer to this interesting article:
http://www.livick.com/method/treadmill/pg1.htm

BTW - check out Mike's recent images from Sweden, and be sure to leave comments.
http://www.pbase.com/mikearst/image/85801127/medium

Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 1:46 pm
by mikemeister_admin
The article is right on, I also think that there are too many options on digital cameras that we will never use. Software programs on your computer are the same.
  Barry

Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 7:51 pm
by -default
I have to agree - OTOH the complexity keeps going up, driven by the market.  As an example closer to home, the number of features in Curvemeister is increasing at a steady rate.  I guess the key is to make it possible to ignore the features that are not necessary.

Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 10:13 pm
by mikemeister_admin
Wait, gentlemen, not so fast!  As Mike has recently gone "against raw" I'd like to point out that if you shoot raw files, many of that somewhat-confused photographer's gripes about "complexity" simply disappear.  With raw files (which is properly spelled "raw" and not "RAW," since it's not a particular file format or an abbreviation for an extension, but the plain word "raw") we can just forget about these things when we're shooting:

-- No "quality" settings
-- No "size" settings
-- No "white balance" settings

Are there more things we can forget about when shooting raw?  Maybe, but I've forgotten them . . .

Also, "more complexity" means "more possibilities" -- and that you or Joe or Peter or I have no particular need of "feature X" in a camera or an application doesn't mean it's not useful to a lot of other folks, and their needs count no less than yours or Joe's or Peter's or mine. 

Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2008 10:21 pm
by mikemeister_admin
Oh yeah, and these also we can happily forget when shooting raw:

-- No "sharpening" settings
-- No "picture control" (saturation/contrast) settings

Frankly, it would stress me out a lot if I were to shoot nothing but JPEGs, with all those hard-wired settings to worry about and getting right! And I've now figured out what that upper-caps "RAW" term is an abbreviation of: "Relax And Work." :-)

Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2008 12:48 pm
by RonBoyd

(which is properly spelled "raw" and not "RAW," since it's not a particular file format or an abbreviation for an extension, but the plain word "raw")


As in "uncooked"?... like the thought?... Or is that half-baked?

Posted: Sun Aug 03, 2008 9:34 pm
by mikemeister_admin
Right on. Uncooked ain't half-baked!